Critical Incident Analysis Group - CIAG

The Critical Incident Analysis Group (CIAG) is an interdisciplinary and inter-professional group of scholars and practitioners, who work to understand the impact of “critical incidents” on people, communities, and social structures. CIAG brings together physicians, social scientists,  law enforcement specialists, and a host of others who are concerned about the profound impact of critical incidents. By analyzing cases that could threaten our security, we may effectively anticipate, prevent, and manage these issues.

Community Shielding: A Foundation for Pandemic Recovery

Community shielding is a concept first formulated in 2002 following the mail anthrax attacks. It is a comprehensive strategy in the event that a larger population faced a significant future pandemic bio threat. The concept of community shielding remains relevant in 2020 during the current COVID-19 crisis and provides a conceptual and strategic understanding of response that overlays the tactic of social distancing. In order to be effective, any strategic concept must fully support and enhance our society’s ability to strengthen long-established concepts within public health. Surveillance, detection, containment and isolation are necessary in order to mitigate excessive morbidity and mortality while at the same time preserving the capacity of our medical systems to provide for greatly expanded diagnostic and treatment needs. When planned prior to an event, community shielding requires implementation in advance of a pandemic in order to blunt the most severe costs to society.

Because of increasing concerns about bio threats for both contagious and non-contagious agents, whether naturally occurring or terrorism-related, it was clear then and now that a collaborative strategy best serves the public during a vulnerable period of infection and/or human-human transmission contagion. The concept recognizes the importance of clear communication from leadership and that when contagion is an issue, it can transcend the physiologic, emotional, social, political, and economic layers within society.

In the eighteen years since the concept of community shielding was first introduced, advances in social media and big data mining have both transformed and exploited democratic society. While they hold great potential, these social media and cyber advances can also be destructive. In fact, the immense wave of social media communication that held such early promise is difficult to efficiently surf. Both in size and in content, it may crash and engulf upon us with the flotsam of misinformation.

Community shielding is a cooperative effort between individuals, families, local government, business, non-governmental organizations, faith-based groups, and any other community resources to provide or augment food, water, medication, and other essential supplies to individuals sheltering in place in homes and other safe locations due to a natural, biological, chemical, or radiological disaster. To equitably serve local and regional needs, effective pandemic planning requires federal and state resources. While community shielding can serve as a national strategy, a range of specific tactics including social distancing, provision of lunch meals to out-of-school children who require them, and use of personal protective equipment, are critical elements. Each community shielding plan should be collaboratively tailored specifically to the community it serves with the understanding that they facilitate long established principles of public health.

What are the advantages of community shielding?

  • Community shielding encourages Americans to do something now – to be proactive and prepare now instead of being reactive under emergency conditions.
  • Community shielding promotes self-reliance and self-sufficiency.
  • Community shielding encourages community specific emergency planning.
  • Community shielding allows individuals to remain in their homes and communities instead of evacuating unnecessarily during a disaster.
  • Community shielding is voluntary or self-imposed instead of forced.
  • Community shielding is a “least restrictive” method of public health intervention compared to other methods i.e. forced quarantine or isolation.
  • Community shielding can be implemented more quickly and easily and at an earlier stage than more restrictive measures and can, thus, reduce the need or scale of more restrictive measures.
  • Community shielding provides a more psychologically and emotionally stable environment during a time of crisis, thus encouraging a more positive response to crisis and better decision-making.
  • Community shielding avoids spontaneous evacuations that have their own inherent risks.
  • In a biological disaster, community shielding helps break the disease cycle with minimal disruption to the routine activities of the nation such as the procurement of necessities.
  • In a terrorist-caused disaster, community shielding helps citizens to defeat the objective of terrorists to disrupt and destroy the American way of life.
  • Community shielding empowers citizens to stand and “fight” the situation instead of fleeing it.
  • Community shielding encourages unity in the face of disaster. It empowers, gives hope and encourages resilience.
  • Community shielding minimizes injury, death and damages while optimizing a successful recovery from disaster.
  • Community shielding promotes successful survival in a disaster situation.
 

Meet the Executive Director

Dr. Gregory Saathoff is a psychiatrist who is a professor in Public Health Sciences and Emergency Medicine at UVA. He also serves as executive director of the University of Virginia’s Critical Incident Analysis Group (CIAG), and since 1996 has served as the FBI’s Conflict Resolution Specialist. He is the chief psychiatric consultant for the FBI’s Behavioral Analysis Units and Crisis Negotiation Unit.

Read More

Collaborative Relationships

The Critical Incident Analysis Group (CIAG) has collaborated with the American National Red Cross, as well as the Department of Defense, the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Justice, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. CIAG also has worked with a variety of UVA departments and other universities.

National Institute of Justice (NIJ) Award: Social Media As a Platform for Crafting Gender-Specific Interventions for the Domestic Radicalization of Women

Co-Principal Investigator Gregory Saathoff and CIAG program assistant Maihan Far Alam are collaborating with Principal Investigator Janet Warren of UVa's Institute for Law, Psychiatry and Public Policy and Donald Brown…

International Meeting in Charleston, SC

The Research Strategies Network (RSN) provided financial support for an August 2017 international meeting in Charleston, SC. Composed of behavioral scientists and government leaders dedicated to providing best practices for…

International Symposium on National Security and Extremist Violence

International Symposium on National Security and Extremist Violence was co-sponsored with the FBI’s Critical Incident Response Group, UVa’s Critical Incident Analysis Group (CIAG), and Research Strategies Network with financial support…

CIAG Executive Director Gregory Saathoff M.D. was invited to the University of Oxford

CIAG Executive Director Gregory Saathoff M.D. was invited to the University of Oxford's Harris Manchester College to participate in a conference entitled “Going to Extremes” sponsored by the Centre for…

The Power of Prevention Conference

The Power of Prevention: Threat Management Strategies to Disrupt Targeted Shooters cosponsored with the FBI’s Critical Incident Response Group and Research Strategies Network. The two-day conference, entitled “ The Power…

New Staff Members

The Critical Incident Analysis Group is happy to announce it has hired four new federal work study students from the University of Virginia as staff members: Raymond Casey Burke, Cameron…

Collective memories: A local nonprofit records area soldiers’ stories of World War II

The interviews from the Nickle for Your Story project were given to Senator Mark Warner. Read more about the Collective Memories Project in the C'Ville Weekly story.

Hollywood meets Grounds

How CIAG was involved in the "Captain Phillips" Saga. John J. Flood spent more than two decades with the FBI in jobs that landed him in the middle of headline-grabbing…

Symposium on Psychology and National Security at the Italian Embassy

CIAG Anthrax Panel Members present on Psychological Perspectives of National Security -- Hosted by the Embassy of Italy. The well-attended symposium drew upon the growing interest in exploring and utilizing all…

Psychiatrist Details Talks With Suspect in Bomb Plot

New York Times article describes report of Dr.  Saathoff  on his forensic assessment of M. Arbabsiar, accused of conspiracy to assassinate the Saudi ambassador to the U.S. Read full article…

Panel to Discuss Critical Incidents at U.Va. Rotunda

March 23, 2012 - A special panel discussion focused on critical incidents will convene Sunday March 25 at 1 p.m in the Dome Room of the University of Virginia’s Rotunda.…

Panel reviews 2001 attacks

The Law School hosted a panel yesterday discussing the 2001 U.S. anthrax attacks which killed five and injured 17 others. The panel focused its discussion on a report reviewing sealed…